Google Vs Yahoo

[nilulk]

Have you ever thought of their differences. Please list what is your view? Some of mine are lsited below. That is


1.Yahoo concentrates more on off page and on page seo.

2.Google concentrates a lot more on off page optimisation.

3.People who use Yahoo as their main search engine instead of Google are simply stupid.


4.Google is the best search engine on the planet and the best company in the world, I love it. Thank you Google for being the same. So list out whats your thoughts regarding this. Advance thanks for replies. Have a great day.

[govindseo]

Dear nilulk,
We all know what's the answer, right? Then why people bother to post one like this?? any way most of the time Google. But Yahoo got some great features as well, like the site explorer.

[eagle1]

As Google and Yahoo! continue their volley of product offerings, I thought it would be useful to compare the interface design solutions each company employed to solve similar user needs. In other words: how does Yahoo’s version of a product (Maps, Local Search, Image Search, etc.) compare to Google’s? Though some product offerings are virtually indistinguishable (Web Search, Image Search), others differ significantly (Groups, Product Search).

At a high level, Yahoo! has better integrated business goals with their product designs. For example, their comparison shopping site features multiple entry points that better match consumer shopping behaviors (browse by brand, browse by category, featured products, etc.) than Froogle’s single search box. Yahoo! also has more robust answers to vertical information finding (Travel, Finance, Movies, etc.) than Google’s Web Search features. That doesn’t negate the value of Google’s simple solutions to these tasks. It’s just that a simple solution sometimes requires something in addition to (or other than) a search box.

[govindseo]

As Google and Yahoo! continue their volley of product offerings, I thought it would be useful to compare the interface design solutions each company employed to solve similar user needs. In other words: how does Yahoo’s version of a product (Maps, Local Search, Image Search, etc.) compare to Google’s? Though some product offerings are virtually indistinguishable (Web Search, Image Search), others differ significantly (Groups, Product Search).

At a high level, Yahoo! has better integrated business goals with their product designs. For example, their comparison shopping site features multiple entry points that better match consumer shopping behaviors (browse by brand, browse by category, featured products, etc.) than Froogle’s single search box. Yahoo! also has more robust answers to vertical information finding (Travel, Finance, Movies, etc.) than Google’s Web Search features. That doesn’t negate the value of Google’s simple solutions to these tasks. It’s just that a simple solution sometimes requires something in addition to (or other than) a search box.

Google vs. Yahoo! Interface Design (http://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?189)



wow nice interface between google and yahoo thanks buddy for sharing...

[joelchrist]

I cant say people who use yahoo as a main keywords are stupid. Becos m getting more traffic from yahoo too.

[king1111]

At a high level, Yahoo! has better integrated business goals with their product designs. For example, their comparison shopping site features multiple entry points that better match consumer shopping behaviors (browse by brand, browse by category, featured products, etc.) than Froogle’s single search box. Yahoo! also has more robust answers to vertical information finding (Travel, Finance, Movies, etc.) than Google’s Web Search features. That doesn’t negate the value of Google’s simple solutions to these tasks. It’s just that a simple solution sometimes requires something in addition to (or other than) a search box.